Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13667 (JHR)

DAUD HASAN ALIAS ALIAS DAUD HASSAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4864/2025 · 2025-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16550] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4864 of 2025 ------ Daud Hasan @ Daud Hassan, aged about 22 years, son of Shaukat Ali, resident of Vill.- Isri Bazar, P.O.- Isri Bazar, P.S.- Nimiyaghat, Dist.- Giridih, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 23-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Nimiyaghat P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 (POCSO Case No.27 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 74, 77, 351 (3), 79 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (E) & 67 (A) of the I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has recorded the obscene video of the victim girl and made the same viral in social media. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-19 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.01.2025 as is evident from para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih in connection with Nimiyaghat P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 (POCSO Case No.27 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/