HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3462 of 2024 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Piyush Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 to 6 and Sri Raj Kumar Singh Suryvanshi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.7. 2. Despite notice being issued to respondent No.8 and having been served as per the office report dated 03.07.2024, none responds on behalf of the respondent No.8. 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 4. There is a consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment and order of this Court passed in a bunch of writ petitions leading being Writ-A No.21492 of 2023 in re: Vinod Kumar Srivastava vs. State of U.P. and 3 others, decided on 30.09.2024. 5. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Ram Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi, Rishabh Tripathi Raj Narayan Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Education And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) allowed. The order impugned dated 06.02.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, is quashed. 6. It is provided that the petitioner of the instant petition would also be entitled to the benefit of the aforesaid judgment. September 3, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 3462 of 2024 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench