Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25576 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3575 of 2025 Applicant :- Badalu @ Badalu Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now 528 of B.N.S.S.) by the applicant with the following prayer:- "it is most respectfully prayed that in the above noted facts and circumstances, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge sheet dated 09.06.2024 filed under section 308, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 IPC as well as the cognizance and summoning order dated 05.11.2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Lakhimpur Kheri in case no.4813/2024 (State versus Ramsanehi and others) relating FIR No. 055/2024, under section 308, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station - Phoolbehad, District - Lakhimpur Kheri, so far as it relates with the petitioner and entire criminal proceedings may kindly be kept in abeyance during pendency of present petition against the petitioner, in the interest of justice." 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the present application, is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench