SRI L. SHANKER, CHITTOOR DST. v. THE DIST. COOP. OFFICER, CHITTOOR & 2 OTHRS
WP/7175/2011 · 2025-07-03
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13666 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13666 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010165882011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7175/2011 Between:
1. SRI L. SHANKER, S/O. PEDDAREDDAPPA GOVT. SERVANT R/O.MADANPALLY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE DIST COOP OFFICER, CHITTOOR
2. THE CHITTOOR DISTRICT COOP MARKETING SOCIETY LTD, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT OFFICE AT CHITTOOR
3. THE CHITTOOR DISTRICT COOP MARKETING SOCIETY LTD, REP. BY ITS BUSINESS MANAGER, OFFICE AT CHITTOOR
...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take steps pursuant to the representation of the petitioner dt. 12.08.2010, by not releasing the salary from July 2009 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 8951 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to make interim payment of arrears pending disposal of writ petition.
IA NO: 4 OF 2011(WPMP 40886 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix up an early date for hearing of W.P. No. 7175 of
2011.
2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T SHARATH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T C KRISHNAN
2. GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 7175 of 2011 ORDER:
Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Writ Petition No:7175 of 2011
Date : 04.07.2025
SPP