Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24778 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4576 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhojraj Singh Respondent :- U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. Thru. Mnaging Director And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Farooqahmad,Rahmatullah Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Shishir Jain Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Farooq Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(I) to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay amount of leave encashment of 300 days to the petitioner forthwith. (II) to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay interest @ 12% from due date i.e. October, 2022 to the date of actual payment on the amount of leave encashment forthwith." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred various representations to the authority concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Managing Director, U.P. Rajkiya NIrman Nigam Ltd. Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench