MOHD TARIQ AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3602/2025 · 2025-12-19
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13662 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13662 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3602/2025
1. Mohd Tariq, aged 30 years S/o Mohd Rafiq
2. Rozia Kouser, aged 21years W/o Mohd Tariq D/o Munshi Khan Both residents of Larkoti, Tehsil Kotranka District Rajouri
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Barkat Ali, Advocate
Vs
1. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Through its Principal Secretary, Home Department Civil Secretariat, Jammu
2. The Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Rajouri
3. The Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station, Kandi District Rajouri
4. Haq Nawaz S/o Munshi Khan
5. Arsha Begum W/o Munshi Khan
Both residents of Morha Tehsil Kotranka District Rajouri
6. Mohd Shabir S/o Mishri Khan R/o Panjnara, Tehsil Kotranka District Rajouri
…..Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Serial No. 215
2 WP(C) No. 3602/2025
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (19.12.2025)
1. The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families. 2. To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a notarized marriage agreement dated
18.12.2025. 3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner no. 2 has placed on record a copy of the date of birth certificate issued by the Headmaster/Principal Abrar Dreamland Middle School Kotranka, Budhal which confirms the fact that the petitioner No. 2 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner No. 1. 4. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 who are to be carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other. 5. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has
3 WP(C) No. 3602/2025
been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law. 6. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb. 7. This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police
4 WP(C) No. 3602/2025
(SSP), Rajouri to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent No. 3-Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station, Kandi District Rajouri that the petitioners, namely Mohd Tariq and Rozia Kouser are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the respondents No. 4 to 6 or any other person acting at the behest and/or on behalf of the respondents No. 4 to 6. Further more in case the Police Station, Kandi District Rajouri or any other Police Station has registered any FIR at the instance of the respondents No. 4 to 6 against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out or facilitated by the Police Station Kandi, District Rajouri. 8.
Disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
19.12.2025
Sneha