2025:JHHC:17583 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5277 of 2025 ------ 1. Jayanti Devi, aged about 34 years, W/o Kamal Oraon. 2. Gangiya Devi @ Gangi Devi, aged about 33 years, W/o Budhram Oraon. Both resident of Village Harchanda, P.O. Dahu, P.S. Oramanjhi, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.PP ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 325, 307, 341, 188, 120B, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of Lalita Devi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is then submitted that Lalita Devi sustained injury on her thigh and it is highly unlikely that she would have died of such injury. It is then submitted that the genesis of occurrence is a land dispute between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioners are females. It is then submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners of using any weapon. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 09.04.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2024 passed in B.A. No.10783 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned AJC-X, Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/