IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7602/2025 Decided on: 08.05.2025 Mohd. Yaseen …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “ (i) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the Impugned action of the Respondents, whereby the Regularization of the Petitioner has delayed unnecessarily and has been regularized on 05-01-2022 instead of 31-08-2020 being patently illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional besides the same being in violation to the settled law of the land. (ii) That the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued to the respondents to extend the benefit of Annexure P-3 to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 petitioner by re-fixing the pay of the petitioner @ Rs. 37600/- on completion of two years of regular service of petitioner alongwith all consequential benefits from due date in the interest of justice and fair play.” 3. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved and the relief prayed for by the petitioner have already been adjudicated in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content, if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 8th May, 2025(rohit) 22 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024