Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010120702025 2025:GAU-AS:9222-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3143/2025 BAKKAR ALI S/O SAMSUL ALI, R/O GORIAMARI NO.2 (PART II), PS. PANBARI, DISTRICT CHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN 783390 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110011 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-8 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CHIRANG ASSAM 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHIRANG ASSAM 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) CHIRANG ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PANBARI POLICE STATION DIST- CHIRANG ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA, L DEKA,POOJA ROY,MS S DEV Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 16.07.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner in this case is Bakkar Ali and, as per instructions received from the petitioner, the father of the petitioner, namely Samsul Ali, has been recovered from Bijni in an unconscious state and has been brought home. It has been submitted that the father of the petitioner was produced before the office of the Superintendent of Police (Border), Chirang, however, as the said authority was not available, his presence could not be recorded. Thereafter, the father of the petitioner has not been keeping well, due to which he could not be produced before the said authority and is currently undergoing treatment. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned standing counsel for the FT matters. 3. Considering that the father of the petitioner has been recovered and has not been taken into custody, the apprehension of his deportation no longer Page No.# 3/3 survives. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again if he remains aggrieved by any action of the State, and as the father of the petitioner has been recovered and is presently at home, there is no purpose in keeping this matter pending. Hence, with the liberty as indicated above, this writ petition stands closed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant