PRIYANKA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/4580/2025 · 2025-04-28
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4580 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priyanka Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar U.P. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Goswami,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 6. Notice to respondent no. 7 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation raising his grievances to respondent no. 5, with a direction to decide the same within a stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before respondent no. 5 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 5 within a further period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench