Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136532 (ALL)

NUMAISHA BANO AND ANOTHER v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN ) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4593/2025 · 2025-04-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24770 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4593 of 2025 Petitioner :- Numaisha Bano And Another Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban ) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Krishna Vishwakarma, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to release all the death- cum-post retiral dues of late Mohd. Akhlaq Ansari such as amount of gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance as well as medical reimbursement expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to consider the claim of the petitioner No.2 for compassionate appointment on some suitable post as per his eligibility expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioners have preferred representations to the authority concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, they may be permitted to prefer a fresh separate representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representations within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners within a stipulated time. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioners to prefer a fresh separate representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Chief Engineer (E-2-1), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), 6, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them annexing therewith copy of their earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of their claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representations of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioners forthwith after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the other concerned persons. 7. It is needless to say that if the amount so prayed here-in- above is payable to the petitioner, the same may be paid to him within the aforesaid stipulated time. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench