Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13653 (RAJ)

NARENDRA SINGH RATHORE URF SUNNY PACHOTA S/O SHRI BALVEER SINGH RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4469/2025 · 2025-04-02

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14845] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4469/2025 Narendra Singh Rathore Urf Sunny Pachota S/o Shri Balveer Singh Rathore, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 97, Mohanlal Ke Mandir Ke Pas, Pachota, Police Station Nava District Didwana, Presently Residing Plot No. 80, Pooja Vihar Vistar, Kalwar Police Station Kalwar District Jaipur West. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Prakash Dhanera, Adv., with Mr. Khem Chand Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 02/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.1144/2024 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 110, 333, 324(4), 324(5) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 110, 333, 324(4)(5), 189(2) and 117(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not named in the [2025:RJ-JP:14845] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4469/2025] FIR. He further submits that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. He argues that co-accused person has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR; absence of criminal antecedents; other co- accused person has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court; dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Narendra Singh Rathore Urf Sunny Pachota S/o Shri Balveer Singh Rathore shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the [2025:RJ-JP:14845] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4469/2025] stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/294