Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136524 (ALL)

AKHAND DUTT TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLR/995/2025 · 2025-09-09

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 995 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard. 2. Present revision has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated dated 29.03.2025 passed by learned Court of IInd Additional Family Court, Hardoi in Criminal Misc. Case No. 3400090/17 (Case No. 90/2017); Smt. Monisha another versus Akhand Dutt Tiwari, under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, Police Station Behata Gokul, District Hardoi, directing to learned court below to provide opportunity for adducing the evidence to the revisionist for proper disposal of the case on merit and allow the revision of revisionist in the interest of justice." 3. Vide order dated 29.03.2025 the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardoi- II (in short "trial Court") passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 3400090 of 2017 (Case No. 90 of 2017) [Smt. Monisha & Another vs. Akhand Dutt Tiwari], has partly allowed the application under Section 125 CrPC preferred by the opposite party No.2 and awarded Rs. 2,000/- per month to the opposite party No.2, Rs. 1,000/- per month for the opposite party No.3/minor son of revisionist, total Rs. 3,000/- per month from the date of filing of application i.e. 22.02.2017 and Rs. 3000/- per month to opposite party No.2 and Rs. 1500/- to the opposite party No.3 as maintenance from the date of decision 29.03.2025. Relevant portion of the order dated 29.03.2025 is extracted here- in-under:- "आदेश प्रािथनी मोिनशा द्वारा प्रस्तुत प्राथर्नापत्र अन्तगर्त धारा-125 दं०प्र०सं० आंिशक रूप से स्वीकार िकया जाता है। िवपक्षी अखण्ड दत्त ितवारी उफर् िपयुष ितवारी को आदेिशत िकया जाता है िक वह प्राथर्नापत्र प्रस्तुत करने के िदनांक 22.02.2017 से आदेश के िदनांक 29.03.2025 तक प्रािथनी मोिनशा को उसके स्वयं Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhand Dutt Tiwari .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) के भरण पोषण हेतु अंकन 2,000/-रूपया (दो हजार रूपया) प्रितमाह तथा नाबािलग पुत्र शुभ (प्राथीर् सं० 2) के भरण पोषण हेतु अंकन 1,000/- रूपया (एक हजार रूपया) प्रितमाह, कु ल 3,000/-रूपया (तीन हजार रूपया) प्रितमाह तथा आदेश के िदनांक 29.03.2025 से प्रािथनी मोिनशा को उसके स्वयं के भरण पोषण हेतु अंकन 3,000/-रूपया (तीन हजार रूपया) प्रितमाह तथा नाबािलग पुत्र शुभ (प्राथीर् सं० 2) के भरण पोषण हेतु अंकन 1,500/- रूपया (एक हजार २० पाँच सौ रूपया) प्रितमाह उसके वयस्क होने तक, कु ल 4,500/-रूपया (चार हजार पाँच सौ रूपया) प्रितमाह बतौर भरण पोषण भत्ता अदा करेगा। आदेश के िदनांक से भरण पोषण भत्ते की अदायगी प्रत्येक माह की दस तारीख तक की जायेगी। प्राथर्नापत्र प्रस्तुत करने के िदनांक 22.02.2017 से आदेश के िदनांक 29.03.2025 के मध्य की भरण पोषण भत्ते की धनरािश िवपक्षी छः माह में प्रािथनी को अदा करेगा। यिद प्रािथनी द्वारा िवपक्षी से कोई धनरािश अंतिरम भरण पोषण के रूप में प्राप्त की गयी है तो वह धनरािश िनणर्य की धनरािश में समािहत की जायेगी।" 4. Taking note of meagre amount awarded by Family Court as also that the observations of the Family Court, which are to the effect that under compelling circumstances the opposite party No.2 alongwith opposite party No.3 left the matrimonial home, have not been impeached and also the various pronouncements on the subject including Anju Garg and another vs. Deepak Kumar Garg, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1314, Sanjeev Kapoor vs. Chandana Kapoor and others, reported in (2020) 13 SCC 172, Chander Parkash Bodh Raj vs. Shila Rani Chander Prakash: 1968 SCC Online Del 52, Rajnesh vs. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324 : (2021) 2 SCC (Civ) 220 : 2020 SCC OnLine SC 903 at page 347, Kulbhushan Kumar Vs. Raj Kumari, (1970) 3 SCC 129 and Kalyan Dey Chaudhary Vs. Rita Dey Chaudhary Nee Nandy, (2017) 14 SCC 200, this Court is of the view that present revision is liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. September 9, 2025 Vinay/- CRLR No. 995 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench