- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19986 WP No. 1087 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1087 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. H C MURALI S/O LATE CHIKKATHAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE JALAHOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT- 562 157. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA H C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYABHAVANA KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK YELAHANKA BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560064. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19986 WP No. 1087 of 2023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO MAKE CORRECTION OF EXTENT IN THE COLUMN NO.9 OF THE COMPUTERIZED RTC AS PER ANNEXURE -F AND G IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER HEREIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to make necessary correction in respect of extent of land reflected in column No.9 in the comprised RTC extracts (Annexure-F and G). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19986 WP No. 1087 of 2023 3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and learned Additional Government Advocate, wherein, the respondent No.2, in the proceedings under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 in RA.(BNA) No.31/2015-16 vide order dated 18.06.2015 (Annexure-F), allowed the appeal preferred by the appellant therein and further civil suit is pending consideration in respect of the subject land in OS No.257 of 2013 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural District. Though the petitioner has approached the respondent No.2, as per Annexure-A, however, the petitioner has not produced the relevant documents along with the petition seeking rectification of extent of land in the RTC extracts. It is also to be noted that the competent authority-respondent No.3 has considered the representation made by the petitioner but not the respondent No.2 and in that - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19986 WP No. 1087 of 2023 view of the matter, petitioner is permitted to file an representation to the respondent No.3 with relevant documents, seeking relief sought with regard to correction of extent of land. If such a representation is made within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, same shall be considered by the respondent No.3, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. In the result, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54