Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-27789 of 2019 in/and CRM-A-2061 of 2019 Date of Decision:11.05.2023. Aazam Parvez .....Applicant/appellant Versus Anis and another ...... Respondent CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the applicant/appellant. ***** VIKRAM AGGARWAL
, J. (ORAL)
1. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant/appellant, despite the case having been called repeatedly.
2. There are two applications, one for condonation of delay of 103 days in filing the appeal and the second is an application under Section 378(4) seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 01.10.2018, vide which the respondent-accused was acquitted in a complaint filed by the present applicant/appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Since, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant/appellant, despite the fact that on the last date of hearing it had been observed that no further adjournment shall be granted, the present applications are dismissed for non- prosecution.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) May 11th, 2023 JUDGE Rekha
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No.
REKHA SHARMA 2023.05.12 15:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document