Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:15729] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4208 of 2025
------ Pampi Das, aged about- 21 years Daughter of Sujit Das Resident of Village- Siteshnagar, P.O. Pakur P.S. Pakur (M), District- Pakur. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-16-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in collusion with the co-accused took loan of Rs.46,930/- for the IndusInd Bank account of the informant by taking her thumb impression several times from CSP operated computer machine. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the co-accused Nitai Das was the owner CSP and the petitioner is the only staff of Nitai Das. It is then submitted that the petitioner is a female. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.03.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that she will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 with the condition that she will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case and she will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/