Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136499 (ALL)

GAURAV SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SINCHAI EVAM JAL SANSADHAN U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIA/3451/2024 · 2025-09-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3451 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of Rs. 59,840/- and 2,57,060/- to petitioner as medical reimbursement. 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided instructions dated 17.05.2024 to submit that the entire payment as sought has already been paid to petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions admits that the entire reimbursement has already been made. 5. In view thereof, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon, the writ petition is, therefore, consigned to record without any adverse effect upon benefit already granted to petitioner. September 18, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Gaurav Saxena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sinchai Evam Jal Sansadhan U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench