Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Vijay Kumar versus State of H.P. Cr.M.P(M) No. 1020 of 2025. 07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent-State. Cr.M.P(M) No. 1020 of 2025 For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the fact that applicant/appellant is in jail, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 93 days’ that has crept up in filing of the main appeal. Application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered. Cr. Appeal No.________ of 2025 Admit. Call for the records. Cr.M.P No.______of 2025. Be registered. Issue notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. She prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List on 04.06.2025.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge (Sushil Kukreja) May 07, 2025
Judge (yogesh/pankaj)