RAJESH RAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/3921/2025 · 2025-04-25
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23773-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3921 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. (Urban Development) And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amol Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard Shri Amol Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Anil Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3.
2. The petitioner claims to have moved application for mutation of his name in respect of the premises in question based on registered free hold deed dated
02.06.2018. The application is said to have been submitted on 28.03.2018.
3. Learned counsel for the Nagar Palika does not have the instructions.
4. Let the opposite party no. 3 look into the matter as to what is the impediment in disposing of the said application. If there is no impediment, then, the same should be disposed of within a period of two months, however, if there is any difficulty in disposing it of the petitioner should be informed in writing.
5. It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the entitlement of the petitioner to be mutated in the records of the Nagar Palika.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 25.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench