Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136441 (ALL)

AMRITA SHARMA v. U.O.I. THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF TELICOMMUNICATION DELHI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4525/2025 · 2025-04-25

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23802 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4525 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amrita Sharma Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Telicommunication Delhi And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelesh Kumar Yadav,Shobh Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Pratul Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Neelesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pratul Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 2 & 4 and Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 1 & 3. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for opposite parties has stated that the petitioner is an employee of Bharat Sanchal Nigam Limited and being a Central Government employee, he may raise his grievance before the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing Original Application. He has also submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and others 1997 (2) SCR 1186, has categorically held that for the grievance of Central Government employee the appropriate forum would be Central Administrative Tribunal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid submission, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed being not maintainable. However, it always open for the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing his Original Application (OA) and if such Original Application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of as per law with expedition. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench