M/S. GREEN VALLEY INDUSTRY v. NAZRUL ISLAM and ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/118/2018 · 2025-01-06
Michael Zothankhuma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13644 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13644 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010120412017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/118/2018 M/S. GREEN VALLEY INDUSTRY C.K. DAS ROAD, P.O. TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR (ASSAM), REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI NAKUL CHANDRA PAUL, S/O. LT. DIGAMBAR PAUL, C.K. DAS ROAD, P.O. TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR (ASSAM). VERSUS NAZRUL ISLAM and ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:LOHIT CHANDRA PATHAK THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003 3:MR. RAKESH KUMAR IAS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006.
4:SHRI MOHENDRA MOHAN BORO THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI
Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI - 781003 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. UMA CHAKRABORTY, MS. M CHATTERJEE,MS. M ACHARYYA,MS R BARUAH,MS. K KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : DR. B AHMED (R2), MR. KHAYERUDDIN (R2),MR. A U AHMED (R2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 07-01-2025 No one appears for the petitioner on call. It is noticed that no one had appeared for the petitioner on the last date also. This contempt petition has been filed on the ground that the respondents had not considered the petitioner’s representation, as has been directed to do so vide order dated 21.08.2017 passed in WP(C) 4612/2016. As no one appears for the petitioner or the respondents on call, it is unclear whether the order dated 21.08.2017 passed in WP(C) 4612/2016 has been complied with, as on date. In view of the fact that the petitioner has not appeared before this Court, this Court is of the view that the contempt petition can be closed, as the same gives rise to an inference that the petitioner is not interested in persuing the matter. However, in the event it is later found that the order of this Court has
Page No.# 3/3 not been complied with and the same has caused prejudice to the petitioner, the contempt petition may be revived, as per law. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant