HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1300 of 2024 Shiv ..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Vikas Singh Yadav, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.1107 of 2024, dated 19.12.2024, under Section 7 of he Criminal Law (Amendment Act, 1937) and Sections 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Manglour, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a no injury case; the applicant is not a previous convict. 4. Learned State counsel admits these facts. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the 2 Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 05.05.2025 Sanjay