SHANU @ ZUAIB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/3518/2025 · 2025-08-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3518 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Mohammad Alishah Faruqi, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shikhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.206 of 2024, under Sections 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in 12 cases, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant is not involved in any other case. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. Co-accused Ayan @ Shoeb has been granted bail in the present case by means of an order dated 30.04.2025 passed by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.3651 of
2025. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases mentioned in the gang chart and that the applicant is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Alishah Faruqi, Azizullah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shanu @ Zuaib .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
languishing in jail since 03.07.2023 whereas a co-accused has already been granted bail in the present case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant- Shanu @ Zuaib be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. August 25, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 3518 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench