Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136314 (ALL)

RAM SUCHIT v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,TEHSIL RUDAULI, AYODHYA,REVENUE AND OTHERS

A227/2383/2025 · 2025-04-30

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24655 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2383 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Suchit Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate,Tehsil Rudauli, Ayodhya,Revenue And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner, is taken on record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned State Counsel and perused the records. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed, seeking following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate Rudauli District-Ayodhya to decide the proceedings of Case No. T202304230702827 "Ram Suchit Vs. Jagjeevan Prasad & others, U/S 24 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, filed by the Petitioner for Demarcation of the land Gata No140K, pending before him since 14-08-2019 as earliest within stipulated time granted by this Hon'ble Court as early as possible, in the interest of justice or to pass such other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner." Taking note of the fact that case in issue i.e. Case No. T202304230702827 (Ram Suchit Vs. Jagjeevan Prasad & others), was instituted under Section 24 of the Code of 2006 and as per Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the demarcation proceedings, being summary in nature, should preferably be decided within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the application for demarcation has not been decided till date, which is pending since August 2019, the respondent No.-1 is directed to consider and decide the pending case in issue, detailed above, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench