HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Anticipatory Bail Application No. 34 of 2024 Mohd. Azeem ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Mohd. Azeem seeks anticipatory bail in FIR NO. 352 of 2024, under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 323, 376, 498-A, 504m 506 IPC, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. This is second anticipatory bail application of the applicant. His first anticipatory bail application has been dismissed in non-prosecution on 17.12.2024. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that charge sheet in this case has been filed; the co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 4. These facts are admitted by the learned State Counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant second anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The second anticipatory bail application is allowed. 2 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iii) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the court concerned. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (ii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.03.2025 Avneet/