Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136209 (ALL)

MUZIB AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A483/353/2025 · 2025-04-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24760 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 353 of 2025 Applicant :- Muzib Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Shukla,Raj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent no. 3 is dispensed with. 2. Present petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed praying for a direction to learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao to take coercive action to ensure the presence of the accused persons namely private opposite for facing trial expeditiously. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that despite non bailable warrant having been issued against private opposite party, he failed to turn up accordingly the applicant has been constrained to file an application seeking initiation of proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. against the private opposite party which application is still pending consideration before the court concerned and it is prayed that the said application be directed to be decided expeditiously. 4. Considering the fact that the application is pending before the learned court, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of with a direction to the learned court to decide the pending application filed by the applicant in accordance with law expeditiously provided there is no legal impediment. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench