HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 24494 of 2003 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. Order on Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 359591 of 2013. 1. Heard Sri Vishal Vishwakarma, learned counsel for petitioner/applicant. 2.The instant application has been filed in respect to deceased sole petitioner/applicant. 3. Application is within limitation. 4. Let the word "deceased" be mentioned against the name of sole petitioner and the name of his legal heirs as mentioned in the prayer clause of the substitution application be substituted as petitioner nos. 1/1 to 1/6. 5. Applications is accordingly allowed. Order on Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 160413 of 2004 1. Heard Sri Vishal Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner- applicant. 2. The instant applications has been filed in respect to deceased respondent no. 4. 3. The proposed heirs of the deceased respondent no. 4 is represented by Sri Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Rai, Alok Kumar Yadav, Sunil Kumar Yadav, Vishal Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anuj Kumar, Arun Kumar Shukla, P.S. Dubey, Prem Prakash, S.S. Tewari Shanker .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue And Others .....Respondent(s) Anil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel. 4. Application is within limitation. 5. Let the word "deceased" be mentioned against the name of respondent nos. 4 and the name of his legal heirs as mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the affidavit be substituted as respondent nos. 4/1, and 4/4. 7. Applications is accordingly allowed. Order on Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 6 of 2025. 1. Heard Sri Vishal Vishwakarma, learned counsel for petitioner/applicant. 2. The instant application has been filed along with affidavit one of the petitioner stating that all the petitioners are not interested to press this petition, hence this writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. 3. Sri Vishal Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the instant writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. 4. In view of the averments made in the affidavit as well as the statement made by Sri Vishal Vishwakarma, learned counsel for petitioner, the application is allowed. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 6. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 11, 2025 Neetu WRIB No. 24494 of 2003 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad