C/M, GYAN CHAND BALIKA SANSKRIT VIDYALAYA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR THR. MANAGER, HARI PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., SECONDARY EDUCATION, LKO AND OTHERS
WRIC/3898/2025 · 2025-04-30
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136103 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136103 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24700 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3898 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M, Gyan Chand Balika Sanskrit Vidyalaya, Ambedkar Nagar Thr. Manager, Hari Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Secondary Education, Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shachindra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing counsel. Sri Shachindra Pratap Singh learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4. Sri Ajay Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he does not wish to press his relief no.1 and his petition may only be considered in so far as the prayer no.2 is concerned. In view of the statement given by Sri Ajay Pratap Singh learned counsel the petition is being considered only in so far as prayer no.2 is concerned. By means of the aforesaid prayer, the petitioner seeks disposal of his representation dated 23.09.2024 sent to the respondent no.4, a copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure no.10. Considering the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, at this stage is not inclined to call for a counter affidavit and is of the view that ends of justice can be met if the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner brought on record as Annexure no.2. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the respondent no.4 shall decide the said representation strictly in accordance with law intimating the same to the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of six weeks from the date of certified
copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench