HAIDAR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A483/361/2025 · 2025-04-25
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136094 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136094 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23954 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 361 of 2025 Applicant :- Haidar Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Waris Farooqui,Deepshikha Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard. 2. The present application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the following prayers :
"it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the court of opposite party No.1 i.e. Learned Judicial Magistrate, Utraula, District Balrampur to decide/conclude the criminal case No. 469 of 2012 "State Vs. Raseed Ahmad and another" arising out of case crime No.227/2012 under section 325, 323, 504 І.Р.С.. related to Police Station Kotwali Utraula, District Balrampur, expeditiously which is pending before him since year 2012, within stipulated time period in the interest of justice."
3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant has lodged an F.I.R. dated 4.3.2012 under Section 325, 323 and 504 I.P.C. against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and after filing of the chargesheet Criminal Case No.469 of 2012 (State vs. Raseed Ahmad and another) has been registered, but despite the fact that the respondents / accused persons put their appearance through counsel on 30.06.2016, but so far the charges have not been framed by the court concerned and it is simply fixing dates in the matter and the applicant is waiting for justice. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant prays that a direction may be issued to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case within stipulated time as this Court may fix. 5. On the other hand learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without entering into the merits of the case, it is expected that the court
concerned shall make endeavour to decide the criminal case No. 469 of 2012 "State Vs. Raseed Ahmad and another" arising out of case crime No.227/2012 under section 325, 323, 504 І.Р.С., related to Police Station Kotwali Utraula, District Balrampur, which is pending before the court concerned, expeditiously, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
If any adjournment is sought by either of the parties, only short dates may be given. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench