AHMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WPIL/214/2025 · 2025-05-15
J J Munir
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80901 Court No. - 49 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 214 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ahmad Hussain And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Balram Jee Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Tripathi B.G. Bhai,C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. On 14.05.2025, we passed the following order:
"Written instructions have been produced by Mr. Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel from the Collector, Basti along with a report also signed by the Collector, which shows inspection carried out relating to the plots that are recorded as garahi. A spot memo has been enclosed to the instructions, and, a field book specially done on 13.05.2025 prepared and annexed.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner will, on the basis of instructions dated 13.05.2025, inquire of his client if he still thinks that there is encroachment in the plot recorded as garahi or the encroachment has been effectively removed after identification of these plots, as done yesterday. Lay this matter again as fresh day after tomorrow i.e. 16.05.2025." Mr. Balramjee Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the Bar, on instructions received from his client, that encroachments in the plot recorded as garahi and the constructions have been removed. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. It is, accordingly, consigned to record.
Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Deepak Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad