POOJA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/4501/2025 · 2025-04-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23814 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4501 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pooja Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 and 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party nos. 4, 5 and 6 are hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties especially opposite party no. 3 to consider the appointment of the petitioner on basis of compassionate appointment under the provision of the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules 1974, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding/directing to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter and consider & decide the representation dated 04.03.2025 moved by petitioner (as contained in Annexure No.11 to this writ petition), in the interest of justice."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the present petition is unmarried sister of the deceased employee and the unmarried sister comes within the definition of family and she being a unmarried sister, therefore, she is dependent of the deceased employee, therefore, her application for compassionate appointment may be considered. She has preferred a representation to the competent authority but to no avail. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh ventilating his grievance taking all pleas
and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, other family members as well as private opposite party nos. 4, 5 and 6, i.e., Principal Rani Rajeshwari Kumari Inter College, Dilippur, District Pratapgarh, Committee of Management, Rani Rajeshwari Kumari Inter College, Dilippur, District- Pratapgarh through its Manager and Sanjay Kumar Saroj son of Indra Pal Saroj resident of village and Post Dilippur, District- Pratapgarh, respectively, with expedition preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench