Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 92/2016 In SWP No. 193/2016
Rakesh Chander …..Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs
Ashwani Kumar, DFO, Kathua .….Respondent(s) Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (20.12.2025)
01. By virtue of an order dated 16.02.2016, the writ petition SWP No. 193/2016 came to be disposed of without adjudication upon merits but by consent of counsel for both parties with a direction to writ respondent No. 2-Chief Conservator of Forest to consider the case of the petitioner for his posting commensurating with his status and position.
02. The institution of the present contempt petition came to take place on 08.03.2016.
03. Ever since its institution, the petitioner has not come forward to apprise this Court as to the status of his posting which he had sought to commensurate with his status and position meaning thereby the purpose of the writ court direction has been served, as such, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time, hence dismissed.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
20.12.2025
Shivalee
Serial No. 15 Supplementary List-I