IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ( PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34958 OF 2015 Between: T.Ramanna, S/o. Nadipanna, Aged about 63 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Room No. 15 & 16, Old Municipal Shopping Complex, Nandyal District. Kurnool ...PETITIONER AND 1. Nandyal Municipality, Nandyal, Commissioner. 2. The Nandyal Municipal Council, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Rep. by its Commissioner. Kurnool District. Rep. by its ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in auctioning the goodwill amount in respect of the shops located in Old Municipal Office Shopping Complex as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the A.P Municipalities Act and A.P Municipalities (Regulations of receipts and Expenditure) Rules 1968. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 44921 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the auctioning of the shops in Old Municipal Office Shopping Complex on 28.10.2015 in pursuance of the Gazette notification, pending disposal of the WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N RANGA REDDY (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010164792015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34958 OF 2015 Between: T. Ramanna, Kurnool District ...PETITIONER AND Commissioner Nandyal Municipality Kurnool Dist and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.0 MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N RANGA REDDY (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34958 OF 2015 ORDER: St The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the 1 respondent in auctioning the goodwill amount in respect of the shops located in Old Municipal Office Shopping Complex as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd /- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri O Manoher Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 2. Orie CC to Sri N Ranga Reddy (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies NLR) TF HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.34958 of 2015 n SEP 2025 o ^ . Current section . DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS