Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23818 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4497 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Tirath Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Culture Affairs And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashwini Kumar Tripathi,Raju Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Tyagi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Ashwini Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Sri Anurag Tyagi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondent concerned, to pay the C.P.F., leave encashment, gratuity and arrears of 7th pay scales to the petitioner with all consequential service benefits with the interest of 18% per anum. (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondent concerned, to pay the pending dues of honorarium in the form of additional work as accountant from February 2001 to March 2015 to the petitioner with 18% interest. (iii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondent concerned, to pay the arrears of remaining salary of extended service from February 2023 to September 2023 to the petitioner with 18% interest." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Director, Ayodhya Shodh Snsthan, Tulsi Smarak Bhawan, Raiganj, Ayodhya (now known as International Ramayan and Vedic Research Institute, Ayodhya) and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Director, Ayodhya Shodh Snsthan, Tulsi Smarak Bhawan, Raiganj, Ayodhya (now known as International Ramayan and Vedic Research Institute, Ayodhya) ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench