Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136009 (ALL)

RAMESH PRASAD TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/4444/2025 · 2025-04-24

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23610 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4444 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Prasad Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Rahul Roshan Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 and 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:- "1.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner w.e.f. 26.08.1998 to 30.06.2010 in terms of judgment & order dated 20.04.2006, financial approval orders dated 12.07.2010 passed by opposite party no. 2 & to decide the representation dated 19.04.2025 made by petitioner to O.P.No. 3 which is annexed as ANNEXURE NO. 4 to this writ petition." Sri Dubey has drawn attention of this Court towards annexure no. 4, which is a representation dated 19.04.2025 preferred by the petitioner to DIOS, which has not been decided till date. However, the petitioner is fully eligible for the dues which has been prayed in this writ petition. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and in the light of the judgement and order dated 20.04.2006 verifying its applicability in the present case and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench