270 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3241-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2025 Krishan Kumar ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Harsh Rekha Kapoor, AAG Haryana for the official respondents. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arises out of order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ellenabad whereby an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed and appeal against the same was partly allowed by the Additional District Judge, Sirsa vide order dated 18.04.2018. 2. As per the E-Court Official Website of the District Courts, Sirsa, the main civil suit being Civil Suit No.386 of 2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 03.04.2025 and hence the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 22.05.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Ankur Goyal 2025.05.23 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document