Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13598 (CHH)

OMPRAKASH SHARMA v. MARAVI KANHAIYA SINGH

CONT/434/2025 · 2025-03-28

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15057 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 434 of 2025 1 - Omprakash Sharma S/o Late Bhagwan Lal Sharma Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Chaterji Line Block No. 2, Quarter No. 18, Godripara Chirmiri, District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Maravi Kanhaiya Singh Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pensions, Surguja Division Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Dy Govt. Advocate ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma}) Order on Board 28/03/2025 1. This instant contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 10 of the Contempt of courts Act, 19771 has been preferred by the petitioner alleging non compliance of the order passed by this court in WPS No. 1266 of 2023 vide order dated 06.03.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent appeared before this court and submitted that the order passed by this court in WPS No. 1266 of 2023 vide order dated 06.03.2024 has duly been complied with. Learned counsel for the respondent placed on record the relevant documents reflecting compliance of the order. 3. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the impugned order as well as the documents placed on record. 2 4. On perusal of the documents placed on record, this court is of the considered view that the order passed by this court has duly been complied with and there remains no willful disobedience on the part of the respondent in order to comply the order passed by this court in WPS No. 1266 of 2023 vide order dated 06.03.2024. 5. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition against the respondent is closed and is hereby disposed of. sd/- ({Arvind Kumar Verma}) JUDGE alfiza