Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4973 of 2022 with CWP Nos.5022, 5023, 5229, 5452, 5458 and 7087 of 2022 Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 _______________________________________________________
1. CWP No.4973 of 2022 Tulsi Prakash …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
2. CWP No.5022 of 2022 Seva Dass …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
3. CWP No.5023 of 2022 Surender Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
4. CWP No.5229 of 2022 Surender Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
5. CWP No.5452 of 2022 Dinesh Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
6. CWP No.5458 of 2022 Roshan Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
7. CWP No.7087 of 2022 Keshav Ram …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
2
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in CWP Nos.4973, 5022, 5023, 5229 and 7087 of 2022. Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in CWP Nos.5452 and 5458 of
2022. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3, in all the petitions. Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 and 5, in all the petitions. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner(s) seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions, with liberty to file afresh, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 14, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?