Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135938 (ALL)

MATA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

CRLP/3422/2025 · 2025-04-30

Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24697-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3422 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mata Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Kumar Chourasia Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the police is unnecessarily calling the petitioner and his family to the police station and harassing and trying to arrest the petitioner. 3. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions states that the petitioner is not required in any criminal case and is not being arrested by the police. 4. In view of the statement made by learned AGA, the writ petition is consigned to record. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Pks (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench