Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13593 (PNJ)

SUNIL @ SUNIL CHAUHAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/2338/2025 · 2025-07-31

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-2338-2025 -1- 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2338-2025 Date of Decision:31.07.2025 Sunil @ Sunil Chauhan …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Aditya Dassaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.S.Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.134 dated 02.11.2023 registered under Sections 302, 201, 120-B of IPC, at Police Station G.R.P. Jalandhar (Annexure P-1). 2. The petitioner had earlier filed a petition i.e. CRM-M-49842-2024 before this Court with similar relief. However, after arguing at length, the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner. Now, the second petition has been filed by the petitioner for the same relief without change of any circumstances and the petition is not maintainable. 3. At this stage, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has already been declared as proclaimed offender on 19.07.2025 and the concerned Court has also ordered that one FIR under Section 174 of IPC may be registered against the petitioner. HEMLATA 2025.08.01 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-2338-2025 -2- 4. In view of the above, the petitioner is not entitled to the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail and the petition is ordered to be dismissed. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 31.07.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.08.01 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document