[2025:RJ-JP:30200] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4471/2025 Kalu @ Jeetram @ Rajesh S/o Prema, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bhawanipura, Ps-Diggi, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.172/2023 registered at Police Station Diggi, District Tonk for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 396 & 460 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that entire prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence but no incriminating evidence is appearing against the petitioner. It is submitted that similar situated co-accused persons namely Omprakash @ Omya & Bablu @ Rajesh have been granted benefit of bail by this court as well as co-ordinate bench of this court. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:30200] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4471/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the material available in the form of charge-sheet and the fact that aforementioned co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court as well as co-ordinate bench of this court; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Kalu @ Jeetram @ Rajesh S/o Prema shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /390