Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135874 (ALL)

GAURI KANT v. U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/4417/2025 · 2025-04-23

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22998 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4417 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gauri Kant Respondent :- U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Sachan Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Amit Sachan, who has appeared on behalf of all opposite parties. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:- "a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned transfer order dated 08.04.2025 issued by Opposite Party No. 2 as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this Writ Petition, in the interest of Justice. b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Opposite Parties to not implement the transferred order dated 08.04.2025 and reconsider as per transfer policy, in the interest of Justice" After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be given liberty to approach the opposite party no. 2, i.e., U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited, Setu Bhawn 16, Madan Mohan Malviya Marg, Lucknow through its Project Manager (Saiyantra) preferring his representation and that representation may be considered sympathetically. The petitioner has stated that since, the petitioner is to retire within a period of two years and at the fag end of his retirement if he is transferred from Lucknow to Ayodhya, he and his entire family may suffer. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue and without interfering the impugned transfer order dated 08.04.2023, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party no. 2, i.e., U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited, Setu Bhawn 16, Madan Mohan Malviya Marg, Lucknow through its Project Manager (Saiyantra) also ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench