Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135871 (MAD)

Vinoth Raja v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/7986/2025 · 2025-04-29

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 29.04.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 Vinoth Raja .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District. 5.Jessica @ Saraswathi .. Respondents Prayer : Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to harass the petitioner unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 within the stipulated period. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kishore Kumar 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to harass the petitioner unnecessarily under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 within the stipulated period. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that based on the complaint given by the fifth respondent, they called the petitioner for enquiry and thereafter, the enquiry was closed since the dispute is civil in nature. They have not harassed the petitioner as alleged in the petition. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication. 3. Since the prayer of the petitioner is, not to harass the petitioner and the respondent police has also denied the alleged harassment and already they conducted an enquiry based on the complaint given by the fifth respondent and the same was closed, nothing survives for further adjudication. In view of the same and recording the above said 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 submission of the learned Government Advocate, this criminal original petition is closed. 29.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Rmk To: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 P. DHANABAL ,J. Rmk Crl.O.P(MD).No.7986 of 2025 29.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis