GOVIND SINGH RAWAT AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/1412/2024 · 2025-06-24
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13585 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13585 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1412 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
None is present for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Mr. Sachin Dhamija, learned counsel submits that he has got instructions on behalf of respondent no.3. So, he seeks a day’s time to file ‘Vakalatnama’ in the present petition. He may do so during the course of the day.
4.
Learned counsel for the State on instructions would submit that after investigation, a final report has been submitted in favour of all the petitioners.
5. In view of the statement made by
learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is closed.
(Pankaj Purohit J.)
24.06.2025 Ravi