Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13585 (AP)

Kasimalla Narayana v. Chittepu Sivakoti Reddy,

CRP/1324/2025 · 2025-09-11

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010165792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1324/2025 Between: 1. KASIMALLA NARAYANA, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O.2-16-60, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHITTEPU SIVAKOTI REDDY, S/o. Gopal Reddy, Aged about 44 years. Business R/o.4-24-44, 7th lane, Muthyalareddy Nagar, Guntu ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition assailing the order passed by the I Additional District Judge, Guntur in I.A.No.1197/2023 in A.S.No.11/2023, dated 22-12-2023 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in EP. No.58/2023 on the file of PrI. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the main C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BABU SUMANTH VELLAMPALLI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1324 OF 2025 O R D E R:- When the matter was listed 1st time on 20.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Thereafter, on 04.07.2025, 18.07.2025 14.08.2025 and 22.08.2025 also there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, on 22.08.2025, to give one more opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was posted to today ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute this Civil Revision Petition. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date : 12.09.2025 TM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1324 OF 2025 Date : 12.09.2025 tm