Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135845 (ALL)

SURESH CHANDRA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3859/2025 · 2025-04-23

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23070-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3859 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner alleges encroachment by opposite party no. 5. 3. The matter is pertaining to private dispute between private parties. Mr. Rahul Roshan Duby, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 5 which is taken on record. It is informed by him that there is a civil suit filed by his client wherein temporary injunction is operating. 4. We are not concerned with these issues. Petitioner may avail other remedies under civil/revenue/criminal law as may be prescribed in law. 5. At this stage, petitioner' counsel insisted that the District Magistrate and the Sub Divisional Magistrate be ordered to remove the encroachment, however, on being asked to show the law or the provision of the statute under which such obligation and authority was there on the said Officers, he could not point out any. 6. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench