IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Manjit Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present petition same is decided by 2. Learned State counsel, objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. The afore prayer of the petitioner is found to be reasonable and accordingly the to treat the present p passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all parties, preferably within copy of this order, in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that petitioner’s representation, we maintainability November 03, vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32313 Date of Decision : Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Deepak Singh Saini, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Raj, Additional A.G., Punjab *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present petition is treated as decided by the respondents in a time-bound manner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. The afore prayer of the petitioner is found to be reasonable and the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to treat the present petition as a representation and take a passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all , preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. It is made clear that while directing respondent No.1 representation, we have neither commented on entertainability/ nor on merits of the petitioner’s claim. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE November 03, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 313-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.11.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Himanshu Raj, Additional A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he treated as a representation and the bound manner. who appears on advance notice, has no The afore prayer of the petitioner is found to be reasonable and present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 etition as a representation and take a decision thereon by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all affected three months from the date of receipt of a while directing respondent No.1 to decide the have neither commented on entertainability/ the petitioner’s claim. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.11.06 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document