Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13583 (HP)

SANJEEVAN SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/4470/2023 · 2025-04-01

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4470 of 2023 Decided on: 1st April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjeevan Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Kumar Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 and 4-State. Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Respondent No.5 ex-parte. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 2. Petitioner has laid challenge to his transfer as Panchayat Secretary from Gram Panchayat Bhated, Block Nagrota Surian, District Kangra to Gram Panchayat Bilaspur, Block Nagrota Surian, District Kangra, ordered on 23.05.2023. The order has been impugned on the grounds 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 that the same has been issued on the basis of a D.O. note and after a short span of the petitioner at his present place of posting, i.e. without letting him complete his normal tenure. 3. Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 13.07.2023 passed in this writ petition, the petitioner has continued to serve at Gram Panchayat Bhated. Learned vice counsel further submits that with the efflux of time, the petitioner has since completed his normal tenure at the aforesaid place and the writ petition, in these circumstances, has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Interim order dated 13.07.2023 is vacated forthwith. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 01, 2025 Judge Mukesh