RAJESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/3875/2025 · 2025-04-28
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Om Prakash Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24066-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3875 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Yadav,Suryansh Narula Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard Ms. Surabhi Rawat holding brief of Shri Suryansh Narula, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional C.S.C. for the State alongwith learned counsel for the RERA.
2. If there is no legal impediment, then, the opposite party no. 4, which is a statutory authority, should satisfy the recovery certificate issued by RERA and deposit the due amount within a reasonable time, say, within a period of one month, failing which the District Magistrate/Collector, Lucknow would be obliged to recover the same and remit to RERA so that the petitioner may receive it.
3. This of course is without prejudice to the rights of the opposite party no. 4 if the proceedings out of which the recovery certificate arises have been assailed in appeal etc., although, the petitioner's counsel says that no appeal has been filed within the statutory period.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench