PURNIMA ALIAS PURNIMA GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSTAHAR LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/4478/2025 · 2025-04-24
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23614 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4478 of 2025 Petitioner :- Purnima Alias Purnima Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Lko And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Tiwari,Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 6. Notice to respondent no.7 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order.
2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice in case respondent no.5 may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer.
4. Perused the record.
5. Considering the above and without entering into merit of the case, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.5 i.e. District Program Officer, (I.C.D.S.), Gonda within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.5 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench